Skip to main content

Emission Dynamics

The emission rate adapts to gauge utilisation, defined as staked supply divided by total supply.

Emission rate formula

Over a time step Δt\Delta t, the protocol mints a quantity proportional to the remaining reserve:

emissions=reserve(1eΔtmax_mint_raterate_factor)\mathrm{emissions} = \mathrm{reserve} \cdot \left(1 - e^{-\Delta t \cdot \mathrm{max\_mint\_rate} \cdot \mathrm{rate\_factor}}\right)

The rate factor aggregates utilisation across all active gauges:

rate_factor=gadjusted_weight(g)graw_weight(g)\mathrm{rate\_factor} = \frac{\sum_g \mathrm{adjusted\_weight}(g)}{\sum_g \mathrm{raw\_weight}(g)}

For each gauge gg, the adjusted weight scales the raw governance weight by the square root of that gauge's staking ratio:

adjusted_weight(g)=raw_weight(g)staked(g)lt_total_supply(g)\mathrm{adjusted\_weight}(g) = \mathrm{raw\_weight}(g) \cdot \sqrt{\frac{\mathrm{staked}(g)}{\mathrm{lt\_total\_supply}(g)}}

Behaviour at limits

When every gauge is fully staked, the rate factor approaches one and emissions run at the maximum decay rate set by governance. When there are no stakers into the gauges, the rate factor approaches zero and emissions throttle proportionally. The emission reserve itself asymptotically approaches zero; there is no fixed end date, only a shrinking remainder. Total YB supply is still hard-capped at 1 billion: minted supply asymptotically approaches that cap and cannot exceed it.

Contrast with CRV

For readers familiar with Curve's CRV schedule, the structural differences are:

CRVYB
SchedulePiecewise: multiplied by 21/42^{-1/4} each yearContinuous exponential decay
AdaptationStaticGauge-utilisation-driven
End stateAsymptotic total supply approximately 3.03 billion CRV1 billion YB hard cap; emission reserve approaches zero